| |
|
|
|
Return
to Index of Writings
COMING BACK HOME TO THE COSMOS
Humanity's Re-Embrace of The Feminine
by Jessica Murray
March 1997
"Patriarchy
is best understood as the 5,000-year birth-canal of the Great Mother Goddess."
-- Richard Tarnas, at the Cycles and Symbols III Conference, San Francisco
February 1997
A long,
long time ago, the cosmic creation force was seen as female: the spark
of life that had begun the Universe was likened to a biological mother
giving birth. The earth, which fed everybody, was seen as maternal. People
saw her caves as wombs, and buried their dead back within the belly of
the Mother, vagina-like cowry shells clutched in their hands.
The moon,
whose phases mirrored human menstrual cycles, was the first object of astrological
observation. Bone markings from the Ice Age indicate that the calendars
in use were lunar. Humans saw themselves as living in an ordered, womblike
universe: there was a luminous night-sky clock up there to gauge the monthly
quarters, and there were the biological cycles of plant, animal and human
kingdoms marking time down here on earth- not apart, not one causing the
other, but interwoven in mutual reflection.
As above,
so below.
While
the Mother was seen to have a dark aspect, as shown in the terrifying crone
archetype of myth, her destructive power was seen as balancing her all-nurturing
beneficent side. As heavenly and earthly affairs were seen to be halves
of a unified whole, so were these two aspects of the divine. It seems that
back in those days the human mind was undeterred by paradox.
Much has
been written about the relatively peaceful goddess-worshipping societies
that existed undisturbed from 8,000 to 5,000 BCE, as far west as England
and as far south as Malta, and how the nomadic invaders from the north
swept through the fertile crescent in the millennia to follow, substituting
their warlike sky-gods for the pantheon of animistic divinities that had
held sway for untold ages before them. It is more than striking that these
bands of Aryan horsemen from what Riane Eisler calls "the very edges of
the world" could have come down to Mesopotamia in wave after relentless
wave and thoroughly taken over those settled, highly functioning civilizations
the way they did, transforming the sociological, political and religious
bases upon which human civilization had been defined for a stretch of time
far more vast than that of recorded history. It was as if the time had
come for an immense shift.
Modern
archeologists have likened the agrarian Golden Age of the Neolithic to
the Garden of Eden alluded to in legend; and the destruction by the Kurgan
conquerors of the matrilineal societies with their earth- and moon-centered
cosmologies has been likened to an Expulsion from the Garden.
So it
happened that by the second millennium before Christ, the seven visible
planets, whose cyclical wanderings offered a timing system more useful
to the pastoralists, became the primary reference point in the heavens.
The Moon was removed from astrological primacy.
This was
the first cataclysmic cosmological shift for the western mind.
The second,
as Richard Tarnas has pointed out, was the Copernican revolution.
Once it
was posited that the earth was neither fixed nor central in the cosmos,
the process of severing the human mind from its moorings got fully underway.
The sun, identified in the neoplatonic Renaissance with the principles
of reason and intelligibility, was now seen to be at the heart of things
astronomically as well. Suddenly, everything was relative. In the centuries
that followed, Descartes, Galileo, Newton and finally Einstein brought
this revelation into physics and ultimately into postmodern philosophy.
It seems almost impossible at this point in western history to imagine
that the cosmos was once seen as an ordered Home with earthlings at the
cherished center. Now, we are untethered in the universe; we are no longer
embedded in Nature; we have no Mother.
For with
the shift from geocentrism to heliocentrism, reverence for the physical
planet Earth began to dry up. She became dis-ensoulled, and the honoring
of nature that had once been theologically central started to become demonized.
"Pagan" rituals practiced by worshippers of the Old Religion were suppressed
as abominations. Feminine archetypal principles such as the sacredness
of the physical body, the sexual instincts, and the animal kingdom that
had traditionally represented them, were judged more and more severely,
as was the entire female race. The focus on the sun, reflected in the triumphant
Big-Daddy deities of Judeo-Christian-Islamic thinking, prepared the way
for a mass world view increasingly fragmented and unconnected. If original
sin codified the idea that life was suspect by default, by now we have
come to the point of revering a modern science nihilistically estranged
from any sense of meaning in the universe, where life is seen to be a freak
byproduct of material processes.
Yet the
takeover by the solar-centered world view introduced something besides
war and hierarchy and ecocide. It brought into the world the process of
individuation. Something happened over the centuries to the tribal mind,
something that bears the stamp of inevitability: humans became, individually
and collectively, more and more autonomous.
Jung describes
the individuation process as requiring a leaving home, as heroes in fairy
tales do when they go off to seek their fortune, a departure that leads,
after a series of hard tests, to a grand return. The homecoming is the
Self coming back to the universal, at a new level of understanding... which
was the point of the whole exercise. Deepened self-knowledge is the prize
at the end of the long, hard journey, the golden fleece won after the trials.
And just as individual seekers must banish themselves from the Whole in
order to reconnect with it again eventually, so has the entire human species
had to forget en masse our divine place in the cosmos in order to come
back to it, now, as the New Age dawns.
There
is a method to the madness of the past five thousand years, and it follows
the archetypal pattern of thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Babies must get
painfully squeezed out of their warm, dark wombs to be born; initiates
into mystery schools tended to go through similarly brutal emergences during
the rites that led to their next level of awareness. And every one of us
who has survived a psychological crisis knows that a dark night of the
soul precedes an awakening into a new sense of identity.
There
is a great death and rebirth scenario going on here, a Plutonian process
on a macrocosmic scale. First humanity had its childhood, enclosed within
the unquestioningly sanctified cosmic Mother -- a phase of history likened
to the planet Neptune, symbol of
undifferentiated unity. Then we were forced out, through a long Saturnine
trauma of constriction, into the cold of a disenchanted universe. Now we
are as a species being birthed into some utterly new consciousness, a moment
in history orchestrated by Uranus,
governor of the shock of awakening.
As Uranus
entered its ruling sign and joined with Jupiter
in February of 1997, we see a signature in the sky for this momentous crossroads.
This is the Age of Aquarius referred to in what by this time has become
pop jargon. There is no single date for its official beginning, but astrologers
consider configurations like that of this year to be indications that we
are indeed on the threshold. I am struck by how much spiritual searching
there seems to be among my friends and clients, by how feminism has evolved
into a movement to resacralize the archetypal feminine, by how many books
there are on the bestseller list that have to do with Jung, with angels,
and with the soul. Most particularly I am struck by how the quantum theorists
are coming to conclusions about acausality and nonlocality that sound an
awful lot like the metaphysics repudiated by Descartes et al.
The Great
Mother seems to be returning to mass consciousness, or, better said, we
are returning to Her. And we have learned something during our adventures
away from Her. It is now time for the synthesis to be forged between our
hard-won individualism and the sense of fundamental unity we once knew.
As the 20th century segues into the 21st one can see the signs of a new
marriage between Eastern mysticism and Western rationalism, between environmental
awareness and technology, between the spheres of the two sexes.
We are
witnessing natural law correcting mass excess in order to return the world
to health.
Bibliography:
Riane
Eisler, The Chalice and the Blade, Sacred Pleasure
Eleanor Gadon, The Once and Future Goddess
This article
was inspired by several of the excellent lectures given at the Cycles and
Symbols Conference III in San Francisco, Feb.14-16, 1997,
including those by:
Rick Tarnas, intellectual historian,
Demetra George, astrologer and mythologist,
Victor Mansfield, physicist and astronomer,
Stanislav Grof, psychiatrist, and
James Hillman, Jungian analyst.
Back
to the top
Return
to Index of Writings
|
|
|